Some time ago, the people of Greenfield, Massachusetts voted by a margin of 2:1 to allow the devil into town and lucifer will establish his presence in the form of a Walmart supermarket. At least that is the view of a particularly aggressive minority (the “1″ in the 2:1 ratio) in Greenfield. They are also known as the CAVE people of Greenfield, Massachusetts (CAVE = Citizens Against Virtually Everything) – See also my post A Species Of Its Own: The Greenfielder.
Now, since Walmart is allowed into town (in all consequence, nobody knows who is coming to town; it may as well be a Kohl’s or Chez Target) the CAVE people have, out of the blue, assumed a modified opinion. Yes, we need a Walmart, but the proposed size is too big for Greenfield. For those who don’t know, the proposed big box store would replace a huge, ugly sandlot. The building of a large supermarket would be a considerable improvement in terms of scenery, and, after all, it would improve life in an economically depressed Franklin County.
I, personally, still fail to see how size matters other than that a smaller size would make the whole project less profitable for the developer and even result in abandoning the project. In my personal opinion, the CAVE people don’t want a big box store. Period. Everybody is entitled to an opinion and to fight for a cause they deem worthwhile. What I don’t like is the lying part. I am highly allergic to lies, and the CAVE people, in lack of factual arguments, turn to lies or scare tactics.
The “Walmart” discussion rekindled a few weeks ago when Ben Clarke, speechwriter from Washington D.C., couldn’t constrain himself and contribute another article to the local newspaper, The Recorder. Unfortunately, I didn’t keep the article, but I will contact the Recorder for a copy. In a nut-shell, he is against a big box store (no surprise here, and I will explain why in the following). When you live in Franklin County, Massachusetts and you read The Recorder, you get used to Ben Clarke’s uncommon sense. Don’t get me wrong, he is an extremely talented writer, but his reasoning against the retail store idea can only be described as bizarre. You read it, and you shake your head. Honestly, the reason I didn’t keep the clip was that I couldn’t believe that anybody would take him seriously. After all, the man is a speechwriter, not a journalist. The difference is that a journalist needs to investigate facts, and Ben Clarke has only opinions to offer.
Fortunately, the system works, and Ben Clarke was promptly rebuked in the nicest way. On August 10, 2010 Isaac Mass, a Greenfield resident and former member of the Town Council, responded with a refreshing and insightful article on Greenfield’s identity (“Walmart wouldn’t ruin our community”). Isaac Mass is a much better man than I am, and he dismantled Ben Clarke in the most polite way by writing about his life in Greenfield and the immediate neighborhood (which include the more or less 8 years Ben Clarke spent in Washington D.C.). He cited examples of other Walmarts, and how they did not destroy the towns they’re in, actually, quite the opposite. After all, the man knows what he is writing about.
The saga continues with another “My Turn” article by Amy Clarke, Ben Clarke’s mother, on August 24, 2010, and now we know where Ben got his opinion. Her reasoning for a smaller sized big box store struck me personally as borderline bizarre. And, yet again, she cites the increase of traffic on High Street (her neighborhood). In another article some time ago, she complained that it would not be possible anymore to send your kids to walk to school due to the threat of high car traffic. As far as I know, two of Amy’s daughters went to Stonleigh-Burnham, a private school here in Greenfield, and Ben went to Northfield Mount Harmon. None of her kids walked to school, and if they did, they did it some twenty years ago. Times (and traffic patterns) have changed since then.
The most disturbing part of her argumentation is her reference to the Walmart in Orange, Massachusetts (roughly a 30 minute drive from downtown Greenfield). Basically, she says she doesn’t want Walmart to trash Greenfield, but it is acceptable they trash Orange, because Orange is already trashed. Of course, these were not her exact words, but the result is the same.
Amy knows Orange well, because as the Executive Director of the Franklin County Community Meals Program (FCCMP) she visits the Orange meal site frequently. Previously, I called Franklin County an economically depressed area, and that term applies specifically to Orange, Massachusetts. The FCCMP provides food to many Orange residents, but also to people in Turners Falls and, after all, Greenfield. Amy Clarke should know that poverty exists not only in Orange. A Walmart, or any other big box store, would be like Christmas in July to a great number of Greenfield residents. Whatever I hear from opponents of the retail store idea, I never read or hear references to people of the lowest income range.
Talking about disturbing… I find it somewhat problematic that Amy engages into public activities such as opposing the Walmart idea. From an ethical standpoint, I would expect that she confers with the FCCMP board to assure there is no conflict of interests. The FCCMP is a non-profit organization and as such should not be drawn into a political discussion. It is my belief, that Amy, an employee of the FCCMP, has crossed that line by arguing in a manner that is counterproductive to the FCCMP’s mission. Her comments, not based on facts and not compliant to the FCCMP’s mission, have cost a great loss of reputation, not only for herself, but also the FCCMP.
And yet again, the system works. Just like her son, Amy Clarke’s writing was promptly rebuked in the nicest way, this time by the Editorial Board of The Recorder. I quote:
- The issue: Is the proposed discount retail store on Greenfield “too big.”
- Our opinion: “Too big” doesn’t seem to come with the facts and data to support that position.
The Recorder – August 25, 2010
Supplement – August 27, 2010
The bashing of Ben and Amy Clarke continues… In today’s Recorder, Robert Sunderland, Executive Director of the local YMCA, comments in the My Turn column, titled An economic matter:
Ben Clarke recently wrote a column in opposition to Walmart coming to Greenfield. I know from Mr. Clarke’s Recorder articles that he recently moved back to Greenfield after living in the Washington, D.C. area for many years. … Mr. Clarke, before you go off opposing a big box store coming to Greenfield, I think you should do some economic research about this part of the world.
He continues later in the article:
Mr. Clarke, I am looking forward to the articles you can write with your new understanding of the demographics of our beautiful Franklin County and how a big box retailer in Greenfield will improve the lives of at least 62 percent of area families.
As a hidden hit at Amy Clarke, Executive Director of FCCMP, who is opposed to the retail store idea, he writes:
I got to hear and read material written and presented by the dedicated people who direct the Franklin County Community Meals Program, Greenfield Salvation Army, Center for Self Reliance Food Bank and Family Shelter Program. These directors told our panel stories of parents they know who struggle every week to pay their bills, buy clothes and feed their family. These families would benefit a great deal if there were a big box retailer in Greenfield.
Let me summarize: Ben Clarke doesn’t research the facts, and Amy Clarke, by arguing against a big box store, works against the interests of the FCCMP. Well, at least that is my interpretation…
Let me add that Amy was furious about Mr. Sunderland’s comments (we talked on the phone today, after I had sent in my resignation from the FCCMP board – See my post My Resignation from the Franklin County Community Meals Program (FCCMP)), calling his arguments unsubstantiated. In the same turn, she stated to me, that she “will loose the battle” on the Walmart topic.
Though it’s a shame you resigned from the Franklin County Community Meals Program, it’s quite understandable considering the lack of judgement, if not integrity, demonstrated by a supposed intelligent people who refuse to speak about things on a factual or at least objective basis.
It’s disturbing that people will speak without the best interest as well as demonstrating the core values of an agency by the leader could occur. I do understand why you stepped down as a board member. If I was a board member (no interest) I’d be demanding an apology to all of the parties concerned and would lean to the dismissal of the Executive Director that doesn’t have a clue about PR and demonstrated the lack of any sort of diplomacy, which is necessary in that position.
Am trusting that this time the people of Greenfield, MA don’t let the loud mouthed hot heads dictate what the town needs. The Town of Greenfield has lost part of it’s populace, businesses, and the heart that it had at one time to the same. It’s a shame, and I’m looking for people to look out for one another, instead of themselves and the perception they want others to have of them. It’s not a rich town though we have some, and with limited jobs it’ll only continue becoming more impoverished.
I came across your blogpost in a google search. I was looking for information about the hearing that occurred this past week at the middle school.
I am a long-time resident of Greenfield, and my kids did go to public schools, and Four Rivers for high school.
There are a few coherent arguments against Wal-mart in New England.
1. Competition with regional retailers – (Now they are all gone)
2. Global and aggressive sourcing of inventory – (True, but there are no/few suppliers of regional, local or global retail goods anywhere in the valley)
3. Bottom dollar compensation and benefits (True)
4. Competition with local retailers (some)
5. Consumption of otherwise potential manufacturing space (True, not relevant since the rezoning)
6. Indian artifacts on site
7. If the store doesn’t thrive economically, it will leave a shell (True, but this is their optimal market and will thrive)
Walmart is excellent at what it does, and that includes destroying regions; retailers and wholesalers, and suckling net worth from the communities within them.
But, the current situation is that the communities are already destroyed. The cost savings of Walmart vs Rich’s was incidental.
The absence of any option to buy underwear in Franklin County isn’t.
I fought Wal-mart in the 90′s. My own business serving the regional department stores was threatened (and destroyed). I’m not fighting this one.
@Richard Witty:
Richard, I hate to say it, but you are a perfect example. The typical Greenfielder denies economical principles. Competition has price-lowering effects. If we had only one gas station in town, we would pay prices way above the national average. If we had only one supermarket in town (Foster’s) prices would sky-rocket. The reason for regional retailers going out of business is, of course, competition through giants like Walmart. The main reason, however, is a failed business model. Retailers in town, specifically Wilson’s, will go out of business due to antiquated methods in regards to purchasing, customer service, marketing, and more. It will be my pleasure to elaborate on this situation in another post. Stay tuned.
Let me also briefly address your “Indian artifacts on site” argument: Quite simply, there is absolutely no evidence of native American presence at the site in question. The fact is, that somebody found some bones in the 1960′s in the area that is now a huge and ugly sandlot. The finder refused to provide any details other than he had found bones. Could be human, could be a wild hog, maybe a bear, could be something else. And that’s the real fact.
Somehow you missed my last line.
“I’m not fighting this one”.
Perhaps you are reacting, rather than actually reading.
@Richard Witty:
My apologies. I did read the last line, but it didn’t make sense to me at the time.